HomeCompareCovey vs Workstream

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Covey vs Workstream

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Covey leads Workstream by 8 points.

Covey scores 47 and Workstream 39 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. Covey and Workstream each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split Covey holds (headed by Bias Audit Transparency) adds up to more weighted points. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Covey 72, Workstream 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 91% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 3 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Covey is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Workstream under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Workstream is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCoveyWorkstream
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20182017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Covey 72 · Workstream 20

    9.4 weighted points to Covey

  2. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Covey 52 · Workstream 61

    1.1 weighted points to Workstream

  3. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Covey 52 · Workstream 47

    0.8 weighted points to Covey

  4. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Covey 30 · Workstream 35

    0.6 weighted points to Workstream

  5. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Covey 25 · Workstream 27

    0.3 weighted points to Workstream

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Covey 58 · Workstream 56

    0.2 weighted points to Covey

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Covey minus Workstream.

CategoryWeightCoveyWorkstreamΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4040--
Bias Audit Transparency18%7220+52+9.4
FRIA Support15%2527-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5247+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5261-9-1.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3035-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5856+2+0.2
Total100%47 (F)39 (F)+8+8.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCoveyWorkstream
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%01—41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain286Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workstream has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey and Workstream sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Workstream, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Workstream last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.