§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Crosschq by 9 points.
Workday Recruiting AI scores 56 and Crosschq 47 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Workday Recruiting AI leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Crosschq leads 2, including Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation, at 20%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to Workday Recruiting AI (Crosschq 50, Workday Recruiting AI 70), 43% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Bias Audit Transparency, Crosschq 38 to Workday Recruiting AI 60.
Vendor profile
Crosschq
Crosschq is a hiring-intelligence platform that combines automated 360 reference checks, an AI Interview Agent that conducts and scores voice/video screening interviews, AI resume matching and ranking, candidate-fraud and identity checks, Traitify personality and cognitive assessments, and quality-of-hire analytics.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Crosschq is filed under Screening AI, Workday Recruiting AI under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Crosschq is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Crosschq | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Crosschq 50 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
4.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Crosschq 38 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
4.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Crosschq 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Crosschq 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to Crosschq
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Crosschq 58 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.4 weighted points to Crosschq
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Crosschq 62 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Crosschq 62 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.2 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Crosschq minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Crosschq | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 70 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 65 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 65 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 56 (F) | -9 | -8.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Crosschq | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Crosschq has 43 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Crosschq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 43 for Crosschq, across 3 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Crosschq last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next