§ The result
Darwinbox leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Darwinbox finishes 17 points clear of JobDiva inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 46 against 29. Darwinbox leads every one of the 7 criteria, JobDiva none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, Darwinbox 35 to JobDiva 30. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Darwinbox 60, JobDiva 28, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Darwinbox holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Darwinbox
Darwinbox is an enterprise HCM suite whose recruitment module uses Darwinbox Sense AI (now sold inside its Cortex agent platform) to parse resumes, stack-rank and recommend candidates with stated fit reasoning, run screening and shortlisting agents, and give candidates an assistant for job matching, interview details and FAQs.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Darwinbox and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Darwinbox is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Darwinbox | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Darwinbox 60 · JobDiva 28
6.4 weighted points to Darwinbox
15% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Darwinbox 58 · JobDiva 38
3.0 weighted points to Darwinbox
18% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Darwinbox 28 · JobDiva 15
2.3 weighted points to Darwinbox
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Darwinbox 55 · JobDiva 40
1.8 weighted points to Darwinbox
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Darwinbox 30 · JobDiva 22
1.2 weighted points to Darwinbox
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Darwinbox 57 · JobDiva 42
1.2 weighted points to Darwinbox
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Darwinbox 35 · JobDiva 30
0.6 weighted points to Darwinbox
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +16.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +16.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Darwinbox minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Darwinbox | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 28 | +32 | +6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 15 | +13 | +2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 22 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 38 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 42 | +15 | +1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 29 (F) | +17 | +16.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Darwinbox | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Darwinbox has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Darwinbox, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Darwinbox last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next