§ The result
Dayforce leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Dayforce scores 57 to 29 for JobDiva, a 28-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. JobDiva leads none of the 7 criteria, and Dayforce is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Dayforce 74, JobDiva 28, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Dayforce holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Dayforce
Dayforce is an enterprise human capital management platform whose Dayforce Recruiting module uses AI to assign letter grades to external job applicants, generate job descriptions, and automate screening and hiring workflows alongside HR, payroll, time, talent, and analytics.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Dayforce and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Dayforce is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Dayforce | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 1992 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Dayforce 74 · JobDiva 28
9.2 weighted points to Dayforce
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Dayforce 42 · JobDiva 15
4.9 weighted points to Dayforce
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Dayforce 63 · JobDiva 38
3.8 weighted points to Dayforce
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Dayforce 68 · JobDiva 40
3.4 weighted points to Dayforce
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Dayforce 40 · JobDiva 22
2.7 weighted points to Dayforce
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Dayforce 70 · JobDiva 42
2.2 weighted points to Dayforce
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Dayforce 47 · JobDiva 30
2.0 weighted points to Dayforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +28.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +28 beside that +28.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Dayforce minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Dayforce | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 28 | +46 | +9.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 15 | +27 | +4.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 22 | +18 | +2.7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 38 | +25 | +3.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 68 | 40 | +28 | +3.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 30 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 70 | 42 | +28 | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 29 (F) | +28 | +28.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Dayforce | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Dayforce has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Dayforce, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Dayforce last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next