§ The result
iMocha leads DevSkiller on all 7 criteria.
iMocha finishes 17 points clear of DevSkiller inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 39. iMocha leads every one of the 7 criteria, DevSkiller none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, DevSkiller 40 to iMocha 48. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (DevSkiller 35, iMocha 68, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage iMocha holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
DevSkiller and iMocha are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | PL | IN |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · iMocha 68
6.6 weighted points to iMocha
18% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · iMocha 44
4.0 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · iMocha 66
2.1 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
DevSkiller 25 · iMocha 38
1.9 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · iMocha 64
1.1 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · iMocha 48
1.0 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · iMocha 66
0.6 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -17.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 68 | -33 | -6.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 44 | -22 | -4.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 66 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 48 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 56 (F) | -17 | -17.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next