§ The result
Jobylon leads DevSkiller on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Jobylon, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 48 and DevSkiller, filed under Assessment, on 39, 9 points apart. Jobylon leads every one of the 7 criteria, DevSkiller none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, DevSkiller 58 to Jobylon 60. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — DevSkiller 35, Jobylon 55 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Jobylon holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
Jobylon
Jobylon is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking system and talent CRM for enterprise employers whose optional AI features score each applicant's CV against the job description, suggest existing candidates for other open roles, draft job ads and screening questions, and run candidate screening and interview scheduling over WhatsApp, SMS and email.
§ The record
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, Jobylon under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only DevSkiller is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | Jobylon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | PL | SE |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · Jobylon 55
4.0 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
DevSkiller 25 · Jobylon 36
1.6 weighted points to Jobylon
18% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · Jobylon 28
1.1 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · Jobylon 58
0.9 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · Jobylon 60
0.6 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · Jobylon 45
0.6 weighted points to Jobylon
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · Jobylon 60
0.2 weighted points to Jobylon
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus Jobylon.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | Jobylon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 36 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 48 (F) | -9 | -9.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | Jobylon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 28 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobylon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next