§ The result
Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads DevSkiller by 17 points.
Pymetrics (Harver Games) finishes 17 points clear of DevSkiller inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 39. DevSkiller and Pymetrics (Harver Games) each lead 3 of the 7 criteria, with 1 level, though the side of the split Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds (headed by Bias Audit Transparency) adds up to more weighted points. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — DevSkiller 22, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 56% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
§ The record
DevSkiller and Pymetrics (Harver Games) are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | Pymetrics (Harver Games) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | PL | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80
10.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
20% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70
7.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60
1.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50
0.6 weighted points to DevSkiller
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35
0.6 weighted points to DevSkiller
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55
0.2 weighted points to DevSkiller
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -17.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -17.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 70 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 80 | -58 | -10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 56 (F) | -17 | -17.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 26 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next