§ The result
Tezi leads DevSkiller by 19 points.
Tezi finishes 19 points clear of DevSkiller under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 39 — across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. Tezi leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while DevSkiller leads 1, including Customer Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — DevSkiller 22, Tezi 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 55% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ The record
DevSkiller is filed under Assessment AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only DevSkiller is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | DevSkiller | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | PL | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
DevSkiller 22 · Tezi 83
11.0 weighted points to Tezi
20% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
DevSkiller 35 · Tezi 52
3.4 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
DevSkiller 40 · Tezi 58
2.2 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
DevSkiller 25 · Tezi 38
1.9 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
DevSkiller 55 · Tezi 63
1.0 weighted points to Tezi
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
DevSkiller 58 · Tezi 50
0.6 weighted points to DevSkiller
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
DevSkiller 52 · Tezi 55
0.4 weighted points to Tezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -19.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -19.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is DevSkiller minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | DevSkiller | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 52 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 83 | -61 | -11.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 63 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 58 (F) | -19 | -19.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | DevSkiller | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for DevSkiller and Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 29 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next