HomeCompareDice vs hackajob

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Dice vs hackajob

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

hackajob leads Dice by 9 points.

hackajob scores 45 and Dice 36 under rubric v1.0 — a 9-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. Dice takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for hackajob, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 1 is level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Dice 32, hackajob 60 — and at a 20% weight it carries 57% of the weighted advantage hackajob holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Dice and hackajob are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordDicehackajob
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded19902014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Dice 32 · hackajob 60

    5.6 weighted points to hackajob

  2. 15% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Dice 45 · hackajob 58

    1.9 weighted points to hackajob

  3. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Dice 25 · hackajob 32

    1.1 weighted points to hackajob

  4. 18% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Dice 25 · hackajob 20

    0.9 weighted points to Dice

  5. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Dice 50 · hackajob 60

    0.8 weighted points to hackajob

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Dice 35 · hackajob 38

    0.4 weighted points to hackajob

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -8.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Dice minus hackajob.

CategoryWeightDicehackajobΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3260-28-5.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2520+5+0.9
FRIA Support15%2532-7-1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%4558-13-1.9
Human Oversight Design12%5555--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3538-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%5060-10-0.8
Total100%36 (F)45 (F)-9-8.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightDicehackajob
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—41Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain80Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%257Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain384Sources on the vendor's own domain

Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 74 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Dice last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
hackajob last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.