HomeCompareDice vs HireQuotient

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Dice vs HireQuotient

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Dice and HireQuotient.

Dice holds a 2-point edge over HireQuotient under rubric v1.0, 36 to 34, with both scored in the Sourcing cohort. HireQuotient takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 4 for Dice, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Dice 25, HireQuotient 18 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Dice holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Dice and HireQuotient are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordDiceHireQuotient
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSSG
Founded19902021

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Dice 25 · HireQuotient 18

    1.3 weighted points to Dice

  2. 15% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Dice 45 · HireQuotient 40

    0.8 weighted points to Dice

  3. 20% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Dice 32 · HireQuotient 35

    0.6 weighted points to HireQuotient

  4. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Dice 35 · HireQuotient 30

    0.6 weighted points to Dice

  5. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Dice 25 · HireQuotient 22

    0.4 weighted points to Dice

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Dice 55 · HireQuotient 57

    0.2 weighted points to HireQuotient

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +2.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Dice minus HireQuotient.

CategoryWeightDiceHireQuotientΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3235-3-0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2518+7+1.3
FRIA Support15%2522+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%4540+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5557-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3530+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%5050--
Total100%36 (F)34 (F)+2+2.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightDiceHireQuotient
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%257Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain245Sources on the vendor's own domain

Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Dice last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireQuotient last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.