HomeCompareDice vs SEEK

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Dice vs SEEK

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SEEK leads Dice on all 7 criteria.

SEEK finishes 18 points clear of Dice under rubric v1.0 — 54 against 36 — across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Of the 7 criteria Dice wins none, and the narrowest lead SEEK holds is on FRIA Support, Dice 25 to SEEK 32. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Dice 32, SEEK 70) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage SEEK holds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Dice is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordDiceSEEK
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSAU
Founded19901997

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Dice 32 · SEEK 70

    7.6 weighted points to SEEK

  2. 18% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Dice 25 · SEEK 40

    2.7 weighted points to SEEK

  3. 15% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Dice 45 · SEEK 60

    2.3 weighted points to SEEK

  4. 12% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Dice 35 · SEEK 50

    1.8 weighted points to SEEK

  5. 8% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Dice 50 · SEEK 64

    1.1 weighted points to SEEK

  6. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Dice 25 · SEEK 32

    1.1 weighted points to SEEK

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Dice 55 · SEEK 62

    0.8 weighted points to SEEK

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Dice minus SEEK.

CategoryWeightDiceSEEKΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3270-38-7.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2540-15-2.7
FRIA Support15%2532-7-1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%4560-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3550-15-1.8
Customer Documentation8%5064-14-1.1
Total100%36 (F)54 (F)-18-17.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightDiceSEEK
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%257Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain237Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice and SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Dice last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SEEK last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.