HomeCompareDice vs SeekOut

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Dice vs SeekOut

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Dice and SeekOut.

Under rubric v1.0, Dice and SeekOut finish 2 points apart, 36 to 34, as two Sourcing entries. The 7 criteria split 4 to 2 in favour of Dice, with 1 level: Dice is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and SeekOut on Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, and SeekOut holds it (Dice 25, SeekOut 40, 18% weight), worth 82% of the weighted advantage SeekOut builds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Dice and SeekOut are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Dice is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordDiceSeekOut
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19902017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Dice 25 · SeekOut 40

    2.7 weighted points to SeekOut

  2. 15% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Dice 45 · SeekOut 35

    1.5 weighted points to Dice

  3. 12% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Dice 55 · SeekOut 45

    1.2 weighted points to Dice

  4. 12% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Dice 35 · SeekOut 25

    1.2 weighted points to Dice

  5. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Dice 50 · SeekOut 35

    1.2 weighted points to Dice

  6. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Dice 32 · SeekOut 35

    0.6 weighted points to SeekOut

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +1.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Dice minus SeekOut.

CategoryWeightDiceSeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3235-3-0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2540-15-2.7
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4535+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5545+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3525+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%5035+15+1.2
Total100%36 (F)34 (F)+2+1.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightDiceSeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—11—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain01—
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%257Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Dice last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.