HomeCompareDice vs UKG

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Dice vs UKG

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

UKG leads Dice by 8 points.

Under rubric v1.0, UKG, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 44 and Dice, filed under Sourcing, on 36, 8 points apart. UKG leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Dice leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Dice 32, UKG 48 — and at a 20% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage UKG holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Dice is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, UKG under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordDiceUKG
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19902020

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 38% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Dice 32 · UKG 48

    3.2 weighted points to UKG

  2. 15% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Dice 45 · UKG 56

    1.6 weighted points to UKG

  3. 15% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Dice 25 · UKG 35

    1.5 weighted points to UKG

  4. 18% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Dice 25 · UKG 30

    0.9 weighted points to UKG

  5. 8% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Dice 50 · UKG 55

    0.4 weighted points to UKG

  6. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Dice 55 · UKG 52

    0.4 weighted points to Dice

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Dice 35 · UKG 38

    0.4 weighted points to UKG

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -7.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Dice minus UKG.

CategoryWeightDiceUKGΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3248-16-3.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2530-5-0.9
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4556-11-1.6
Human Oversight Design12%5552+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%3538-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%5055-5-0.4
Total100%36 (F)44 (F)-8-7.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightDiceUKG
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—02—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain02—
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%257Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain68Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Dice has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; UKG has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Dice sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 32 for Dice, across 4 distinct source domains, and 14 for UKG, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Dice last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
UKG last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.