§ The result
Greenhouse leads Dover on all 7 criteria.
Greenhouse finishes 22 points clear of Dover under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 45 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria, Dover none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, Dover 60 to Greenhouse 64. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Dover 34, Greenhouse 78 — and at a 20% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Dover
Dover is an AI recruiting platform for startups offering a free applicant tracking system, candidate sourcing via a LinkedIn/Copilot browser extension, OpenAI/Anthropic-powered 0-100 applicant scoring, and a fractional-recruiter marketplace.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
Dover is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Greenhouse is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Dover | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Dover 34 · Greenhouse 78
8.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
18% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Dover 52 · Greenhouse 86
6.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Dover 50 · Greenhouse 64
2.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Dover 30 · Greenhouse 42
1.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Dover 44 · Greenhouse 58
1.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Dover 58 · Greenhouse 66
1.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Dover 60 · Greenhouse 64
0.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Dover minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Dover | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 34 | 78 | -44 | -8.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 52 | 86 | -34 | -6.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 64 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 58 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 67 (D) | -22 | -21.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Dover | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 13 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Dover has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Dover and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Dover, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Dover last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next