§ The result
Greenhouse leads Draup on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and Draup (Sourcing): 67 (D) for Greenhouse, 42 (F) for Draup. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Draup leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Draup 33, Greenhouse 86, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 39% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Draup
Draup is an AI-powered talent- and sales-intelligence platform that aggregates over a billion public professional profiles into skills, roles and labour-market analytics, and surfaces ranked candidate shortlists for enterprise workforce planning and recruiting.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
Draup is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Draup | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Draup 33 · Greenhouse 86
9.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Draup 48 · Greenhouse 78
6.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Draup 28 · Greenhouse 58
3.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Draup 25 · Greenhouse 42
2.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Draup 54 · Greenhouse 64
1.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Draup 58 · Greenhouse 66
1.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Draup 57 · Greenhouse 64
0.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -24.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -24.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Draup minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Draup | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 78 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 33 | 86 | -53 | -9.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 64 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 58 | -30 | -3.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 67 (D) | -25 | -24.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Draup | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Draup has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Draup and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Draup, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Draup last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next