§ The result
HeyMilo leads Emi on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, HeyMilo scores 61 (D) to 33 (F) for Emi, a 28-point gap between two Screening entries. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Emi leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Emi 18, HeyMilo 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 42% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Emi
Emi runs AI agents on WhatsApp, SMS and Messenger that screen and score frontline job applicants against employer-set criteria, schedule interviews, and collect hiring documents and check them against Mexican government databases.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
§ The record
Emi and HeyMilo are both filed under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Emi | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AR | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Emi 18 · HeyMilo 83
11.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Emi 28 · HeyMilo 58
6.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Emi 44 · HeyMilo 62
2.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Emi 25 · HeyMilo 42
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Emi 44 · HeyMilo 64
2.4 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Emi 48 · HeyMilo 66
1.4 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Emi 35 · HeyMilo 46
1.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -28.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -28 beside that -28.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Emi minus HeyMilo.
| Category | Weight | Emi | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 58 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 83 | -65 | -11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 62 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 44 | 64 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 46 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 66 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 61 (D) | -28 | -28.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Emi | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Emi has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emi and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Emi, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Emi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
Scored against