§ The result
PageUp leads Emi on all 7 criteria.
PageUp (ATS-integrated) and Emi (Screening) are 31 points apart under rubric v1.0, 64 (D) for PageUp against 33 (F) for Emi. Emi leads none of the 7 criteria, and PageUp is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Emi 18, PageUp 80, 18% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage PageUp builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Emi
Emi runs AI agents on WhatsApp, SMS and Messenger that screen and score frontline job applicants against employer-set criteria, schedule interviews, and collect hiring documents and check them against Mexican government databases.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Emi is filed under Screening AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Emi | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AR | AU |
| Founded | 2017 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Emi 18 · PageUp 80
11.2 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Emi 28 · PageUp 74
9.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Emi 44 · PageUp 63
2.9 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Emi 44 · PageUp 64
2.4 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Emi 35 · PageUp 55
2.4 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Emi 25 · PageUp 40
2.3 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Emi 48 · PageUp 63
1.2 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -31.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 31.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -31 beside that -31.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Emi minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Emi | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 74 | -46 | -9.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 80 | -62 | -11.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 63 | -19 | -2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 44 | 64 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 55 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 63 | -15 | -1.2 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 64 (D) | -31 | -31.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Emi | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Emi has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emi and PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Emi, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Emi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next