§ The result
Versant by Pearson leads Emi on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Versant by Pearson (Assessment) opens a 16-point lead on Emi (Screening), 49 to 33. Versant by Pearson takes all 7 criteria and Emi none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, Emi 25 to Versant by Pearson 30. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Emi 28, Versant by Pearson 63 — and at a 20% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Versant by Pearson holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Emi
Emi runs AI agents on WhatsApp, SMS and Messenger that screen and score frontline job applicants against employer-set criteria, schedule interviews, and collect hiring documents and check them against Mexican government databases.
Vendor profile
Versant by Pearson
Versant by Pearson is a suite of AI-scored English proficiency tests (plus spoken Spanish, French, Arabic and Dutch) that automatically score candidates' spoken and written responses on Pearson's Global Scale of English within minutes, used by employers such as contact centres and BPOs to screen applicants and benchmark staff through the ScoreKeeper dashboard.
§ The record
Emi is filed under Screening AI, Versant by Pearson under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Versant by Pearson is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Emi | Versant by Pearson |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AR | GB |
| Founded | 2017 | 1844 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Emi 28 · Versant by Pearson 63
7.0 weighted points to Versant by Pearson
18% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Emi 18 · Versant by Pearson 42
4.3 weighted points to Versant by Pearson
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Emi 44 · Versant by Pearson 56
1.4 weighted points to Versant by Pearson
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Emi 44 · Versant by Pearson 53
1.3 weighted points to Versant by Pearson
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Emi 48 · Versant by Pearson 61
1.0 weighted points to Versant by Pearson
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Emi 35 · Versant by Pearson 43
1.0 weighted points to Versant by Pearson
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Emi 25 · Versant by Pearson 30
0.8 weighted points to Versant by Pearson
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -16.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Emi minus Versant by Pearson.
| Category | Weight | Emi | Versant by Pearson | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 63 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 42 | -24 | -4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 30 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 53 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 44 | 56 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 43 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 61 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 49 (F) | -16 | -16.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Emi | Versant by Pearson | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Emi has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Versant by Pearson has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emi and Versant by Pearson sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Emi, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for Versant by Pearson, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Emi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Versant by Pearson last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next