HomeCompareEmmersion vs Korn Ferry

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs Korn Ferry

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Korn Ferry takes the total, Emmersion takes more of the criteria.

Within the Assessment cohort, Korn Ferry edges Emmersion by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 46 to 44. Emmersion leads more of the criteria, 4 against 3 for Korn Ferry, yet Korn Ferry takes Bias Audit Transparency, which carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Emmersion 28, Korn Ferry 48 — and at an 18% weight it carries 88% of the weighted advantage Korn Ferry holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Emmersion and Korn Ferry are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionKorn Ferry
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20151969

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emmersion 28 · Korn Ferry 48

    3.6 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  2. 15% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emmersion 30 · Korn Ferry 25

    0.8 weighted points to Emmersion

  3. 8% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · Korn Ferry 52

    0.6 weighted points to Emmersion

  4. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emmersion 38 · Korn Ferry 33

    0.6 weighted points to Emmersion

  5. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · Korn Ferry 52

    0.3 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  6. 20% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · Korn Ferry 58

    0.2 weighted points to Korn Ferry

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · Korn Ferry 52

    0.1 weighted points to Emmersion

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus Korn Ferry.

CategoryWeightEmmersionKorn FerryΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5758-1-0.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2848-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5052-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5352+1+0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3833+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%6052+8+0.6
Total100%44 (F)46 (F)-2-2.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionKorn Ferry
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain107Sources on the vendor's own domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Korn Ferry has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 17 for Korn Ferry, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Korn Ferry last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.