HomeCompareEmmersion vs Oracle Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs Oracle Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Oracle Recruiting leads Emmersion on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, Oracle Recruiting, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 49 and Emmersion, filed under Assessment, on 44, 5 points apart. Oracle Recruiting takes all 7 criteria from Emmersion without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Bias Audit Transparency, Emmersion 28 to Oracle Recruiting 30. Even Data Governance Disclosure, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Emmersion 50, Oracle Recruiting 60, 15% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Emmersion is filed under Assessment AI, Oracle Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Emmersion is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionOracle Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20151977

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    1.5 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  2. 12% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    0.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 69% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emmersion 30 · Oracle Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  4. 20% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · Oracle Recruiting 60

    0.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  5. 18% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emmersion 28 · Oracle Recruiting 30

    0.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emmersion 38 · Oracle Recruiting 40

    0.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · Oracle Recruiting 62

    0.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus Oracle Recruiting.

CategoryWeightEmmersionOracle RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5760-3-0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2830-2-0.4
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5060-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5360-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%44 (F)49 (F)-5-4.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionOracle Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain12—
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain134Sources on the vendor's own domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.