HomeCompareEmmersion vs Recruitly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs Recruitly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate Emmersion and Recruitly.

Emmersion holds a 3-point edge over Recruitly under rubric v1.0, 44 to 41, across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Recruitly takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 4 for Emmersion, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Emmersion takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Emmersion 57, Recruitly 45), which is 42% of the weighted advantage Emmersion holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, Emmersion 28 to Recruitly 15.

§ The record

Emmersion is filed under Assessment AI, Recruitly under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Emmersion is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionRecruitly
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSAE
Founded20152015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · Recruitly 45

    2.4 weighted points to Emmersion

  2. 18% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emmersion 28 · Recruitly 15

    2.3 weighted points to Emmersion

  3. 12% weight · 69% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · Recruitly 60

    0.8 weighted points to Recruitly

  4. 12% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emmersion 38 · Recruitly 45

    0.8 weighted points to Recruitly

  5. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emmersion 30 · Recruitly 35

    0.8 weighted points to Recruitly

  6. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · Recruitly 45

    0.8 weighted points to Emmersion

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · Recruitly 58

    0.2 weighted points to Emmersion

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus Recruitly.

CategoryWeightEmmersionRecruitlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5745+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2815+13+2.3
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5045+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5360-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3845-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%44 (F)41 (F)+3+3.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionRecruitly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain325Sources on the vendor's own domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 77 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitly last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.