HomeCompareEmmersion vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emmersion vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Emmersion on all 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores 53 and Emmersion 44 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is ahead of Emmersion on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Post-Market Monitoring at Emmersion 38 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Emmersion 57, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Emmersion is filed under Assessment AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Emmersion is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEmmersionSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20151972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emmersion 57 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    2.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emmersion 28 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    2.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emmersion 50 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    1.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emmersion 53 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emmersion 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emmersion 38 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emmersion 60 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emmersion minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightEmmersionSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5770-13-2.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2840-12-2.2
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5060-10-1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5362-9-1.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%44 (F)53 (F)-9-8.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmmersionSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%355Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Emmersion has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 35 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emmersion and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 40 for Emmersion, across 5 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Emmersion last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.