§ The result
Enhancv leads Jobright.ai on all 7 criteria.
Enhancv finishes 22 points clear of Jobright.ai under rubric js-v1.0 — 68 (D) against 46 (F) — across the Resume AI and Job matching cohorts. Enhancv leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Application Honesty among them; Jobright.ai leads none. Application Honesty is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Enhancv 68, Jobright.ai 35, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Vendor profile
Jobright.ai
Jobright.ai is an AI job-search copilot for job seekers that matches candidates to listings, tailors resumes and cover letters, surfaces insider referrals, and offers an auto-apply agent (Orion) that fills and submits applications across supported job boards.
§ The record
Enhancv is filed under Resume & profile AI, Jobright.ai under AI job matching. They record no secondary category in common.
| Record | Enhancv | Jobright.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | BG | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Enhancv 68 · Jobright.ai 35
6.6 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Enhancv 78 · Jobright.ai 45
5.0 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Enhancv 80 · Jobright.ai 55
3.8 weighted points to Enhancv
10% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Enhancv 62 · Jobright.ai 40
2.2 weighted points to Enhancv
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Enhancv 52 · Jobright.ai 38
1.7 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Enhancv 60 · Jobright.ai 54
1.2 weighted points to Enhancv
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Enhancv 72 · Jobright.ai 60
1.0 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +21.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +21.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus Jobright.ai.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | Jobright.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 35 | +33 | +6.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 54 | +6 | +1.2 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 55 | +25 | +3.8 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 45 | +33 | +5.0 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 38 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 40 | +22 | +2.2 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 60 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 68 (D) | 46 (F) | +22 | +21.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | Jobright.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Jobright.ai has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Jobright.ai, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobright.ai last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against