§ The result
Enhancv leads LandEarly by 6 points.
Enhancv scores 68 and LandEarly 62 under rubric js-v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Resume AI and Auto-apply cohorts. Enhancv leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Employer & ATS Legitimacy, while LandEarly leads 2, including Data & Credential Safety, and 1 is level. Enhancv takes the heaviest weighted swing, Employer & ATS Legitimacy at 15% (Enhancv 78, LandEarly 60), which is 42% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Support & Accountability, Enhancv 72 to LandEarly 44.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Vendor profile
LandEarly
LandEarly is an AI auto-apply platform that monitors job boards, generates role-tailored resumes and cover letters from a job seeker's real history, and submits applications through supported applicant tracking systems, with a review-before-submit step and an optional autopilot mode.
§ The record
Enhancv is filed under Resume & profile AI, LandEarly under Auto-apply tools. They also share 3 secondary categories: Tracker, Job matching and Career coaching.
| Record | Enhancv | LandEarly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | BG | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2026 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Enhancv 78 · LandEarly 60
2.7 weighted points to Enhancv
8% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Enhancv 72 · LandEarly 44
2.2 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Enhancv 60 · LandEarly 66
1.2 weighted points to LandEarly
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Enhancv 80 · LandEarly 72
1.2 weighted points to Enhancv
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Enhancv 52 · LandEarly 50
0.2 weighted points to Enhancv
10% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Enhancv 62 · LandEarly 63
0.1 weighted points to LandEarly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +5.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +5.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus LandEarly.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | LandEarly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 68 | - | - |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -1.2 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 72 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 60 | +18 | +2.7 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 63 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 44 | +28 | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 68 (D) | 62 (D) | +6 | +5.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | LandEarly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; LandEarly has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 16 for LandEarly, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LandEarly last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against