§ The result
Enhancv leads LazyApply on all 7 criteria.
Rubric js-v1.0 puts 31 points between Enhancv (Resume AI) and LazyApply (Auto-apply): 68 (D) for Enhancv, 37 (F) for LazyApply. Enhancv leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Employer & ATS Legitimacy among them; LazyApply leads none. Employer & ATS Legitimacy is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Enhancv 78, LazyApply 25, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 26% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Vendor profile
LazyApply
LazyApply is a Chrome extension that automatically mass-applies to jobs on LinkedIn, Indeed, ZipRecruiter, Dice and Greenhouse by auto-filling application forms from a saved profile, and tracks the submitted applications in an analytics dashboard.
§ The record
Enhancv is filed under Resume & profile AI, LazyApply under Auto-apply tools. They also share 1 secondary category: Tracker.
| Record | Enhancv | LazyApply |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | BG | IN |
| Founded | 2014 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Enhancv 78 · LazyApply 25
7.9 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Enhancv 68 · LazyApply 32
7.2 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Enhancv 80 · LazyApply 33
7.0 weighted points to Enhancv
8% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Enhancv 72 · LazyApply 42
2.4 weighted points to Enhancv
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Enhancv 52 · LazyApply 35
2.0 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Enhancv 60 · LazyApply 50
2.0 weighted points to Enhancv
10% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Enhancv 62 · LazyApply 42
2.0 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +30.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 30.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +31 beside that +30.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus LazyApply.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | LazyApply | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 32 | +36 | +7.2 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +2.0 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 33 | +47 | +7.0 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 25 | +53 | +7.9 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 35 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 42 | +20 | +2.0 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 42 | +30 | +2.4 |
| Total | 100% | 68 (D) | 37 (F) | +31 | +30.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | LazyApply | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 3 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; LazyApply has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LazyApply sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for LazyApply, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LazyApply last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against