§ The result
Enhancv leads Resume Worded by 8 points.
Enhancv scores 68 and Resume Worded 60 under rubric js-v1.0 — an 8-point gap inside the Resume AI cohort. Enhancv leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Effectiveness Evidence, while Resume Worded leads 1, including Data & Credential Safety. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Pricing & Cancellation Fairness (Enhancv 62, Resume Worded 42) and Effectiveness Evidence at 12% (Enhancv 52, Resume Worded 34), the second being 26% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Vendor profile
Resume Worded
Resume Worded scores an uploaded resume or LinkedIn profile PDF out of 100 against its own recruiter-derived checklist and returns line-by-line feedback, AI rewrite suggestions and job-description keyword matching, but does not search for or submit job applications.
§ The record
Enhancv and Resume Worded are both filed under Resume & profile AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Career coaching.
| Record | Enhancv | Resume Worded |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | BG | GB |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Enhancv 52 · Resume Worded 34
2.2 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Enhancv 68 · Resume Worded 58
2.0 weighted points to Enhancv
10% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Enhancv 62 · Resume Worded 42
2.0 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Enhancv 80 · Resume Worded 72
1.2 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Enhancv 60 · Resume Worded 64
0.8 weighted points to Resume Worded
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Enhancv 72 · Resume Worded 66
0.5 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Enhancv 78 · Resume Worded 75
0.4 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +7.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus Resume Worded.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | Resume Worded | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 58 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.8 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 72 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 75 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 34 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 42 | +20 | +2.0 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 66 | +6 | +0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 68 (D) | 60 (D) | +8 | +7.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | Resume Worded | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Resume Worded has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for Resume Worded, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Resume Worded last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against