§ The result
Enhancv leads Sensei AI on all 7 criteria.
Rubric js-v1.0 puts 35 points between Enhancv (Resume AI) and Sensei AI (Live interview): 68 (D) for Enhancv, 33 (F) for Sensei AI. Enhancv leads every one of the 7 criteria and 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Application Honesty among them; Sensei AI leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Employer & ATS Legitimacy (Enhancv 78, Sensei AI 25) and Application Honesty at 20% (Enhancv 68, Sensei AI 20), the second being 28% of the weighted advantage Enhancv holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Enhancv
Enhancv is a Bulgaria-based resume and cover-letter builder that pairs templates with an AI writing assistant, a 27-check ATS resume checker, one-click tailoring to a job description, and supporting tools including a Kanban job application tracker, a Chrome extension for saving postings, an AI job board and AI mock interviews.
Vendor profile
Sensei AI
Sensei AI is a real-time interview copilot that listens to a candidate's live job interview, transcribes the interviewer's questions and displays structured, resume-tailored answers on screen in about a second, with an added coding copilot and AI resume builder.
§ The record
Enhancv is filed under Resume & profile AI, Sensei AI under Live interview assistance. They record no secondary category in common.
| Record | Enhancv | Sensei AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | BG | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Enhancv 68 · Sensei AI 20
9.6 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Enhancv 78 · Sensei AI 25
7.9 weighted points to Enhancv
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Enhancv 80 · Sensei AI 48
4.8 weighted points to Enhancv
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Enhancv 60 · Sensei AI 42
3.6 weighted points to Enhancv
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Enhancv 52 · Sensei AI 22
3.6 weighted points to Enhancv
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Enhancv 72 · Sensei AI 38
2.7 weighted points to Enhancv
10% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Enhancv 62 · Sensei AI 38
2.4 weighted points to Enhancv
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +34.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 34.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +35 beside that +34.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Enhancv minus Sensei AI.
| Category | Weight | Enhancv | Sensei AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 68 | 20 | +48 | +9.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +3.6 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 80 | 48 | +32 | +4.8 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 78 | 25 | +53 | +7.9 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 52 | 22 | +30 | +3.6 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 62 | 38 | +24 | +2.4 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 72 | 38 | +34 | +2.7 |
| Total | 100% | 68 (D) | 33 (F) | +35 | +34.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Enhancv | Sensei AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 23 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Enhancv has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Sensei AI has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sensei AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Enhancv, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Sensei AI, across 8 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Enhancv last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sensei AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
The full profiles
Scored against