§ The result
iMocha leads Equalture on all 7 criteria.
iMocha sits 12 points above Equalture under rubric v1.0, 56 against 44, with both filed under Assessment. iMocha leads every one of the 7 criteria, Equalture none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Equalture 40 to iMocha 44. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Equalture 45, iMocha 68 — and at a 20% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage iMocha holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Equalture
Equalture is a game-based pre-employment assessment platform whose short browser games measure candidates' cognitive abilities and behavioural tendencies and convert them into a Fit Score ranked against an employer-specific "Success Profile" derived from that employer's own top performers.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
Equalture and iMocha are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Equalture | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | NL | IN |
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Equalture 45 · iMocha 68
4.6 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Equalture 50 · iMocha 64
1.7 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Equalture 55 · iMocha 66
1.6 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Equalture 30 · iMocha 38
1.2 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Equalture 38 · iMocha 48
1.2 weighted points to iMocha
18% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Equalture 40 · iMocha 44
0.7 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Equalture 60 · iMocha 66
0.5 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -11.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Equalture minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | Equalture | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 68 | -23 | -4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 44 | -4 | -0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 66 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 64 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 48 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 56 (F) | -12 | -11.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Equalture | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Equalture last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next