HomeCompareEqualture vs Zoho Recruit

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Equalture vs Zoho Recruit

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

2 points separate Equalture and Zoho Recruit.

Equalture (Assessment) edges Zoho Recruit (ATS-integrated) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 44 to 42. Equalture and Zoho Recruit each lead 1 of the 7 criteria, with 5 level, though the side of the split Equalture holds (headed by Bias Audit Transparency) adds up to more weighted points. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Equalture 40, Zoho Recruit 24 — and at an 18% weight it carries 100% of the weighted advantage Equalture holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

Equalture is filed under Assessment AI, Zoho Recruit under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordEqualtureZoho Recruit
Price tierHighLow
HeadquartersNLIN
Founded20181996

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Equalture 40 · Zoho Recruit 24

    2.9 weighted points to Equalture

  2. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Equalture 38 · Zoho Recruit 40

    0.2 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 2 figures above sum to +2.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Equalture minus Zoho Recruit.

CategoryWeightEqualtureZoho RecruitΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4545--
Bias Audit Transparency18%4024+16+2.9
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5555--
Human Oversight Design12%5050--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%44 (F)42 (F)+2+2.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEqualtureZoho Recruit
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%197Sources on the vendor's own domain107Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Equalture has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Zoho Recruit has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Equalture, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Zoho Recruit, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Equalture last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Zoho Recruit last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.