HomeCompareFactorial vs Sova Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Factorial vs Sova Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Sova Assessment and Factorial.

Sova Assessment (Assessment) edges Factorial (ATS-integrated) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 48 to 46. Factorial takes 3 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 4 for Sova Assessment, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Factorial 25, Sova Assessment 38) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 61% of the weighted advantage Sova Assessment holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Factorial is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Sova Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Sova Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordFactorialSova Assessment
Price tierLowHigh
HeadquartersESGB
Founded20162015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Factorial 25 · Sova Assessment 38

    2.3 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  2. 12% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Factorial 48 · Sova Assessment 40

    1.0 weighted points to Factorial

  3. 15% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Factorial 35 · Sova Assessment 40

    0.8 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  4. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Factorial 57 · Sova Assessment 52

    0.8 weighted points to Factorial

  5. 20% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Factorial 52 · Sova Assessment 55

    0.6 weighted points to Sova Assessment

  6. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Factorial 58 · Sova Assessment 55

    0.4 weighted points to Factorial

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Factorial 60 · Sova Assessment 62

    0.2 weighted points to Sova Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Factorial minus Sova Assessment.

CategoryWeightFactorialSova AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5255-3-0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2538-13-2.3
FRIA Support15%3540-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5752+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5855+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4840+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%46 (F)48 (F)-2-1.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFactorialSova Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain42Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%277Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain288Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Factorial has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Sova Assessment has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sova Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Factorial, across 3 distinct source domains, and 34 for Sova Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Factorial last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Sova Assessment last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.