HomeCompareFeenyx vs Versant by Pearson

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Feenyx vs Versant by Pearson

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Versant by Pearson leads Feenyx by 9 points.

Versant by Pearson finishes 9 points ahead of Feenyx under rubric v1.0, 49 to 40, both scored as Assessment entries. Feenyx takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 6 for Versant by Pearson, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Feenyx 42, Versant by Pearson 63) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage Versant by Pearson holds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Feenyx and Versant by Pearson are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordFeenyxVersant by Pearson
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20161844

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Feenyx 42 · Versant by Pearson 63

    4.2 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  2. 18% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Feenyx 25 · Versant by Pearson 42

    3.1 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  3. 15% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Feenyx 25 · Versant by Pearson 30

    0.8 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  4. 12% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Feenyx 38 · Versant by Pearson 43

    0.6 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  5. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Feenyx 55 · Versant by Pearson 61

    0.5 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  6. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Feenyx 50 · Versant by Pearson 53

    0.4 weighted points to Versant by Pearson

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Feenyx 58 · Versant by Pearson 56

    0.2 weighted points to Feenyx

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Feenyx minus Versant by Pearson.

CategoryWeightFeenyxVersant by PearsonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4263-21-4.2
Bias Audit Transparency18%2542-17-3.1
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5053-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5856+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3843-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5561-6-0.5
Total100%40 (F)49 (F)-9-9.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFeenyxVersant by Pearson
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%80Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%305Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain236Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Feenyx has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Versant by Pearson has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Feenyx and Versant by Pearson sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Feenyx, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for Versant by Pearson, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Feenyx last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Versant by Pearson last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.