Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Fetcher vs Humanly
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Fetcher
AI-powered candidate sourcing and outbound recruiting platform that automates passive and active talent sourcing, personalized email outreach, and inbound applicant screening for corporate recruiting teams.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Fetcher minus Humanly.
| Category | Weight | Fetcher | Humanly | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 27 | 45 | -18 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 40 | -12 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 40 | +15 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 58 | -6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 30 | +5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 52 | +3 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 42 (F) | -5 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Fetcher
19 rows across 7 categories
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3
- documentation
- 10
Evidence count
Humanly
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 9
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3