Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Fetcher vs Tezi
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Fetcher
AI-powered candidate sourcing and outbound recruiting platform that automates passive and active talent sourcing, personalized email outreach, and inbound applicant screening for corporate recruiting teams.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Fetcher minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | Fetcher | Tezi | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 27 | 52 | -25 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 28 | 83 | -55 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 55 | — |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 63 | -11 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 58 | -23 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 50 | +5 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 58 (F) | -21 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Fetcher
19 rows across 7 categories
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3
- documentation
- 10
Evidence count
Tezi
14 rows across 7 categories
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- documentation
- 3