§ The result
Huru leads Final Round AI on all 7 criteria.
Rubric js-v1.0 puts 28 points between Huru (Career coaching) and Final Round AI (Live interview): 64 (D) for Huru, 36 (F) for Final Round AI. Huru leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Application Honesty among them; Final Round AI leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Employer & ATS Legitimacy (Final Round AI 20, Huru 82) and Application Honesty at 20% (Final Round AI 22, Huru 70), the second being 34% of the weighted advantage Huru holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Final Round AI
A macOS and Windows desktop app that listens to a job seeker's live interview on Zoom, Meet, Teams, Webex, HackerRank or a phone screen and streams AI-written answers into a private overlay hidden from screen sharing, alongside practice interviews and automatic post-session debriefs.
Vendor profile
Huru
Huru is an AI mock-interview preparation app that converts a job posting into a tailored practice interview and scores the job seeker's recorded video answers on content accuracy, speech clarity, pacing, filler words and perceived confidence.
§ The record
Final Round AI is filed under Live interview assistance, Huru under AI career coaching. They record no secondary category in common.
| Record | Final Round AI | Huru |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Final Round AI 22 · Huru 70
9.6 weighted points to Huru
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Final Round AI 20 · Huru 82
9.3 weighted points to Huru
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Final Round AI 45 · Huru 70
3.8 weighted points to Huru
10% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Final Round AI 35 · Huru 60
2.5 weighted points to Huru
20% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Final Round AI 50 · Huru 62
2.4 weighted points to Huru
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Final Round AI 28 · Huru 33
0.6 weighted points to Huru
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Final Round AI 58 · Huru 62
0.3 weighted points to Huru
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -28.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -28 beside that -28.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Final Round AI minus Huru.
| Category | Weight | Final Round AI | Huru | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 22 | 70 | -48 | -9.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -2.4 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 45 | 70 | -25 | -3.8 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 20 | 82 | -62 | -9.3 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 28 | 33 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 35 | 60 | -25 | -2.5 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 64 (D) | -28 | -28.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Final Round AI | Huru | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Final Round AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Huru has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Huru sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 68 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Final Round AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 35 for Huru, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Final Round AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Huru last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next