§ The result
LoopCV leads Final Round AI by 14 points.
LoopCV sits 14 points above Final Round AI under rubric js-v1.0 — 50 against 36 — with LoopCV filed under Auto-apply and Final Round AI under Live interview. LoopCV leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Application Honesty, while Final Round AI leads 1, including Data & Credential Safety. Application Honesty is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Final Round AI 22, LoopCV 55 — and at a 20% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage LoopCV holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Final Round AI
A macOS and Windows desktop app that listens to a job seeker's live interview on Zoom, Meet, Teams, Webex, HackerRank or a phone screen and streams AI-written answers into a private overlay hidden from screen sharing, alongside practice interviews and automatic post-session debriefs.
Vendor profile
LoopCV
LoopCV is a job-search automation platform that continuously matches a job seeker's CV to postings across 30+ job boards and applies on their behalf via ATS form-fills, LinkedIn Easy Apply, and templated emails to recruiters.
§ The record
Final Round AI is filed under Live interview assistance, LoopCV under Auto-apply tools. They record no secondary category in common.
| Record | Final Round AI | LoopCV |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | Low |
| Headquarters | US | GR |
| Founded | 2023 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Final Round AI 22 · LoopCV 55
6.6 weighted points to LoopCV
10% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Final Round AI 35 · LoopCV 65
3.0 weighted points to LoopCV
15% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Final Round AI 20 · LoopCV 38
2.7 weighted points to LoopCV
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Final Round AI 45 · LoopCV 60
2.3 weighted points to LoopCV
20% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Final Round AI 50 · LoopCV 40
2.0 weighted points to Final Round AI
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Final Round AI 28 · LoopCV 35
0.8 weighted points to LoopCV
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Final Round AI 58 · LoopCV 68
0.8 weighted points to LoopCV
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -14.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Final Round AI minus LoopCV.
| Category | Weight | Final Round AI | LoopCV | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 22 | 55 | -33 | -6.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 50 | 40 | +10 | +2.0 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 20 | 38 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 35 | 65 | -30 | -3.0 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 58 | 68 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 36 (F) | 50 (F) | -14 | -14.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Final Round AI | LoopCV | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | — |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Final Round AI has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; LoopCV has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LoopCV sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Final Round AI, across 4 distinct source domains, and 14 for LoopCV, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Final Round AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LoopCV last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next