§ The result
Greenhouse leads Findem on all 7 criteria.
Greenhouse scores 67 (D) and Findem 58 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria, Findem none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Findem 83 to Greenhouse 86. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Findem 58, Greenhouse 78 — and at a 20% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Findem
AI talent-intelligence platform that uses 'attribute'/3D-data enrichment over 850M+ candidate profiles to power candidate search, sourcing, talent CRM, and agentic recruiting workflows.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
Findem is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Findem | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Findem 58 · Greenhouse 78
4.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Findem 42 · Greenhouse 58
1.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Findem 57 · Greenhouse 64
1.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Findem 60 · Greenhouse 66
0.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Findem 38 · Greenhouse 42
0.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
18% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Findem 83 · Greenhouse 86
0.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Findem 58 · Greenhouse 64
0.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Findem minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Findem | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 78 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 86 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 67 (D) | -9 | -9.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Findem | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Findem has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Findem and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Findem, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Findem last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next