§ The result
Fountain leads Toggl Hire on 5 of the 7 criteria.
Fountain scores 44 and Toggl Hire 37 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. Fountain leads 5 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 2 are level, so Toggl Hire is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 5 Fountain leads is Customer Documentation, Fountain 52 to Toggl Hire 50. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Fountain 50, Toggl Hire 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 55% of the weighted advantage Fountain holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Fountain
AI-powered high-volume hiring platform that automates sourcing, applicant screening (including a voice-based AI Recruiter), interview scheduling, and onboarding for frontline workforces.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
Fountain is filed under Screening AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Toggl Hire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Fountain | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | EE |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Fountain 50 · Toggl Hire 30
4.0 weighted points to Fountain
18% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Fountain 30 · Toggl Hire 20
1.8 weighted points to Fountain
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Fountain 58 · Toggl Hire 52
0.7 weighted points to Fountain
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Fountain 40 · Toggl Hire 35
0.6 weighted points to Fountain
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Fountain 52 · Toggl Hire 50
0.2 weighted points to Fountain
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +7.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +7.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Fountain minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | Fountain | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 30 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 20 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 30 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 37 (F) | +7 | +7.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Fountain | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Fountain has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Fountain, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Fountain last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next