§ The result
Greenhouse leads Fuel50 on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Greenhouse, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 67 (D) and Fuel50, filed under Sourcing, on 58 (F), 9 points apart. Fuel50 is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Greenhouse takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Customer Documentation, Fuel50 62 to Greenhouse 64. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Fuel50 68, Greenhouse 86, 18% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Fuel50
Fuel50 is an AI internal talent marketplace and workforce-transformation platform that matches employees to internal roles, gigs, mentors, learning and career paths, and fit-scores and ranks internal candidates for open roles and succession pipelines, using a skills ontology curated by in-house I/O psychologists.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
Fuel50 is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Fuel50 is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Fuel50 | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Fuel50 68 · Greenhouse 86
3.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Fuel50 40 · Greenhouse 58
2.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Fuel50 70 · Greenhouse 78
1.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Fuel50 32 · Greenhouse 42
1.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Fuel50 61 · Greenhouse 66
0.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Fuel50 62 · Greenhouse 64
0.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -9.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Fuel50 minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Fuel50 | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 70 | 78 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 86 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 42 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 64 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 61 | 66 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 64 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 67 (D) | -9 | -9.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Fuel50 | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Fuel50 has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Fuel50 and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for Fuel50, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Fuel50 last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next