Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Harri
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Gloat leads Harri by 6 points.
Gloat scores 47 and Harri 41 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Gloat: Gloat is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Harri on FRIA Support. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Gloat 38, Harri 22, 18% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage Gloat builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat6
- Harri1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 22
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Harri under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Harri |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight28% of the movement so far
Gloat38Harri222.9 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight53% of the movement so far
Gloat48Harri352.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight76% of the movement so far
Gloat28Harri442.4 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight87% of the movement so far
Gloat62Harri521.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
Gloat58Harri520.9 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight98% of the movement so far
Gloat42Harri400.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62Harri600.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +5.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Harri, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Harri | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 35 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 22 | +16 | +2.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 44 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 41F | +6 | +5.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Harri | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.