Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs HiBob
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Gloat takes the total, HiBob takes more of the criteria.
Gloat (Sourcing) edges HiBob (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 47 to 46. HiBob leads more of the criteria than Gloat — 4 to 3 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Gloat leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Gloat. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Gloat 38, HiBob 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 93% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat3
- HiBob4
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 20
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, HiBob under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | HiBob |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight49% of the movement so far
Gloat38HiBob203.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight70% of the movement so far
Gloat48HiBob551.4 weighted points to HiBob
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight86% of the movement so far
Gloat28HiBob351.1 weighted points to HiBob
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat42HiBob470.6 weighted points to HiBob
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Gloat58HiBob570.1 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight99% of the movement so far
Gloat62HiBob630.1 weighted points to HiBob
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62HiBob610.1 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +0.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus HiBob, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | HiBob | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 20 | +18 | +3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 57 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 63 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 47 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 61 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 46F | +1 | +0.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | HiBob | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.