Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Humanly
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Gloat leads Humanly by 5 points.
Gloat scores 47 and Humanly 42 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. Humanly takes 2 of the 7 criteria, FRIA Support among them, against 5 for Gloat, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure. One criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, is both the widest raw gap (Gloat 58, Humanly 40) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 45% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat5
- Humanly2
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure58 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Humanly under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Humanly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight36% of the movement so far
Gloat58Humanly402.7 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight56% of the movement so far
Gloat42Humanly301.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight70% of the movement so far
Gloat28Humanly351.1 weighted points to Humanly
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight81% of the movement so far
Gloat62Humanly520.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight89% of the movement so far
Gloat48Humanly450.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight95% of the movement so far
Gloat62Humanly580.5 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat38Humanly400.4 weighted points to Humanly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Humanly, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Humanly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 45 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 52 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 42F | +5 | +4.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Humanly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Humanly last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.