Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Indeed
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Indeed
Job marketplace whose employer-side AI (the Talent Scout agent, Sourcing Assistant, Smart Screening and candidate matching) sources, ranks and scores candidates from Indeed's profile pool and applicant flow and drafts outreach to them.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
3 points separate Indeed and Gloat.
Under rubric v1.0, Indeed and Gloat finish 3 points apart, 50 to 47, as two Sourcing entries. Gloat takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 4 for Indeed, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 2 are level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 48, Indeed 58 — and at a 20% weight it carries 53% of the weighted advantage Indeed holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat1
- Indeed4
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 58
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat and Indeed are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Indeed |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight50% of the movement so far
Gloat48Indeed582.0 weighted points to Indeed
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight87% of the movement so far
Gloat28Indeed381.5 weighted points to Indeed
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight93% of the movement so far
Gloat42Indeed400.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Gloat62Indeed640.2 weighted points to Indeed
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62Indeed630.1 weighted points to Indeed
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -3.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Indeed, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Indeed | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 63 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 64 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 50F | -3 | -3.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Indeed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 2 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Indeed has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Indeed sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 69 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 40 for Indeed, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Indeed last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against