Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads Gloat by 10 points.
Rubric v1.0 scores the Sourcing entries Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and Gloat at 57 and 47, a gap of 10 points. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Gloat leads 3, including Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 38, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84 — and at an 18% weight it carries 71% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat3
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT)4
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 84
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat and Juicebox (PeopleGPT) are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2022 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight61% of the movement so far
Gloat38Juicebox (PeopleGPT)848.3 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight72% of the movement so far
Gloat42Juicebox (PeopleGPT)551.6 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight83% of the movement so far
Gloat62Juicebox (PeopleGPT)501.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight91% of the movement so far
Gloat28Juicebox (PeopleGPT)351.1 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight97% of the movement so far
Gloat48Juicebox (PeopleGPT)520.8 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight99% of the movement so far
Gloat58Juicebox (PeopleGPT)560.3 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62Juicebox (PeopleGPT)600.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Juicebox (PeopleGPT), coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 84 | -46 | -8.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 56 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 60 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 57F | -10 | -9.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.