Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Pin
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Pin
Pin is an AI recruiting agent that searches a database of 850M+ candidate profiles, scores and ranks candidates for fit, can automatically screen out non-matches (each with a one-line reason), and runs outreach and interview scheduling.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Gloat leads Pin by 7 points.
Inside the Sourcing cohort, rubric v1.0 puts Gloat on 47 and Pin on 40, 7 points apart. Gloat leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Pin leads 2, including Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Gloat 48, Pin 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage Gloat holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat5
- Pin2
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat and Pin are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2024 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight45% of the movement so far
Gloat48Pin303.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight63% of the movement so far
Gloat62Pin501.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight78% of the movement so far
Gloat58Pin501.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight85% of the movement so far
Gloat62Pin550.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight92% of the movement so far
Gloat38Pin350.5 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Gloat42Pin450.4 weighted points to Pin
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28Pin300.3 weighted points to Pin
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Pin, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Pin | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 30 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 40F | +7 | +6.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Pin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 32 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Pin has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Pin, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pin last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
The full profiles
Scored against