Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Recruitee
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Recruitee
Collaborative applicant tracking system, part of the Tellent group, with AI-assisted features for job-description generation, screening candidates against team-defined criteria, resurfacing past applicants, and summarizing evaluation feedback.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Gloat leads Recruitee on all 7 criteria.
Gloat scores 47 and Recruitee 42 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. Gloat is ahead of Recruitee on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at Gloat 28 to Recruitee 27. The advantage Gloat holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Gloat 38, Recruitee 30, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 30% of the weighted points Gloat gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat7
- Recruitee0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency38 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight30% of the movement so far
Gloat38Recruitee301.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight56% of the movement so far
Gloat48Recruitee421.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight75% of the movement so far
Gloat58Recruitee520.9 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight85% of the movement so far
Gloat62Recruitee580.5 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight92% of the movement so far
Gloat62Recruitee580.3 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight97% of the movement so far
Gloat42Recruitee400.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28Recruitee270.1 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Recruitee, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Recruitee | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 42 | +6 | +1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 27 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 52 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 42F | +5 | +4.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Recruitee | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitee last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.