Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is the recruiting module of SAP's cloud HCM suite, using AI (career-site skills matching, job-description generation, resume skills extraction and stack-ranking of applicants) delivered under SAP Business AI and the Joule assistant.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Gloat by 6 points.
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores 53 and Gloat 47 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Gloat takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 4 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 2 are level. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Gloat 48, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 72% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat1
- SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting4
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 70
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | 2015 | 1972 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight69% of the movement so far
Gloat48SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting704.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight86% of the movement so far
Gloat28SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting351.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight91% of the movement so far
Gloat38SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting400.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
Gloat58SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting600.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat42SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting400.2 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -5.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 70 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 35 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 62 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 62 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 53F | -6 | -5.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.