Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs SEEK
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
SEEK
SEEK runs employment marketplaces in Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia (SEEK, Jobstreet and Jobsdb), and its seekAi employer tools label and rank applicants as 'high-fit' using a model trained on millions of past hirer shortlisting decisions, target job ads at predicted high-fit candidates, and run AI voice or text pre-screens, recommended shortlists and reference checks through a feature called Assist.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
SEEK leads Gloat on 6 of the 7 criteria.
SEEK scores 54 and Gloat 47 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. SEEK leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Gloat is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 SEEK leads is Bias Audit Transparency, Gloat 38 to SEEK 40. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Gloat 48, SEEK 70) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 65% of the weighted advantage SEEK holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat0
- SEEK6
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 70
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SEEK under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | SEEK |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2015 | 1997 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight65% of the movement so far
Gloat48SEEK704.4 weighted points to SEEK
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight79% of the movement so far
Gloat42SEEK501.0 weighted points to SEEK
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight88% of the movement so far
Gloat28SEEK320.6 weighted points to SEEK
- 4
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight93% of the movement so far
Gloat38SEEK400.4 weighted points to SEEK
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Gloat58SEEK600.3 weighted points to SEEK
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62SEEK640.2 weighted points to SEEK
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -6.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -6.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus SEEK, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | SEEK | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 70 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 32 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 62 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 64 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 54F | -7 | -6.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | SEEK | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 23 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SEEK last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.