Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs SeekOut
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Gloat leads SeekOut by 13 points.
Rubric v1.0 scores the Sourcing entries Gloat and SeekOut at 47 and 34, a gap of 13 points. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Gloat: Gloat is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and SeekOut on Bias Audit Transparency. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap (Gloat 62, SeekOut 35) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Gloat 58, SeekOut 35), 27% of the weighted advantage Gloat builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat6
- SeekOut1
- Widest raw gap
- Customer Documentation62 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat and SeekOut are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Gloat is in scope of
| Record | Gloat | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight26% of the movement so far
Gloat58SeekOut353.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight46% of the movement so far
Gloat48SeekOut352.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Customer Documentation
8% weight63% of the movement so far
Gloat62SeekOut352.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight78% of the movement so far
Gloat62SeekOut452.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight94% of the movement so far
Gloat42SeekOut252.0 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Gloat28SeekOut250.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat38SeekOut400.4 weighted points to SeekOut
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus SeekOut, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | SeekOut | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 35 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 35 | +23 | +3.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 45 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 35 | +27 | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 34F | +13 | +12.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | SeekOut | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against