Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Tengai
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Tengai
Tengai runs structured screening interviews through a browser-based AI avatar and combines candidates' yes/no qualification answers, a Five-Factor-based personality score and recruiter ratings of open answers into an automatically ranked shortlist.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Gloat leads Tengai on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Gloat scores 47 and Tengai 42 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. Gloat leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Tengai is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Gloat leads is Article 11 Technical Documentation, Gloat 48 to Tengai 45. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (Gloat 42, Tengai 33) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Gloat 58, Tengai 50), 25% of the weighted advantage Gloat builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat6
- Tengai0
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring42 vs 33
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Tengai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SE |
| Founded | 2015 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight25% of the movement so far
Gloat58Tengai501.2 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight47% of the movement so far
Gloat42Tengai331.1 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight66% of the movement so far
Gloat38Tengai330.9 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight78% of the movement so far
Gloat48Tengai450.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight90% of the movement so far
Gloat62Tengai550.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat62Tengai580.5 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +4.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Tengai, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Tengai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 45 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 33 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 28 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 58 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 33 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 42F | +5 | +4.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Tengai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 37 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 71 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tengai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.