Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Gloat vs Zappyhire
Gloat
Gloat is an AI-powered internal talent marketplace and "agentic HR" platform that matches an employer's existing employees to internal job openings, gigs, projects, mentorships, and learning based on inferred skills and career goals.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Zappyhire
Zappyhire is an AI-powered recruitment automation platform that screens and ranks candidates through resume parsing, a recruiting chatbot, AI assessments, and robotic video interviews, layered on an applicant tracking system.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Gloat leads Zappyhire on all 7 criteria.
Gloat sits 13 points above Zappyhire under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 34 — with Gloat filed under Sourcing and Zappyhire under Screening. Gloat is ahead of Zappyhire on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at Gloat 28 to Zappyhire 25. The advantage Gloat holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Gloat 48, Zappyhire 30, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 28% of the weighted points Gloat gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Gloat7
- Zappyhire0
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation48 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Gloat is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Zappyhire under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Gloat | Zappyhire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight28% of the movement so far
Gloat48Zappyhire303.6 weighted points to Gloat
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight47% of the movement so far
Gloat58Zappyhire422.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight61% of the movement so far
Gloat38Zappyhire281.8 weighted points to Gloat
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight74% of the movement so far
Gloat42Zappyhire281.7 weighted points to Gloat
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Gloat62Zappyhire501.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight96% of the movement so far
Gloat62Zappyhire451.4 weighted points to Gloat
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Gloat28Zappyhire250.4 weighted points to Gloat
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Gloat minus Zappyhire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Gloat | Zappyhire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 30 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 38 | 28 | +10 | +1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 45 | +17 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 47F | 34F | +13 | +12.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Gloat | Zappyhire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 21 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Gloat has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Zappyhire has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Zappyhire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Gloat, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Zappyhire, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Gloat last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Zappyhire last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.